Daily market read

The Memphis Classic: Xiyu Wang vs Caty McNally

Do not citeas of 2026-07-28 (UTC)Current daily snapshot

Participant-flow coverage is measured, but unknown flow remains material.

Use only as a review target. Current-card issues must clear before this price is used as evidence.

Market quality 66 (interval 41-75)Evidence confidence medium2 measured | 3 heuristic | 1 pendingpolymarket

The diligence packet carries the memo language, audit chain, and the Markdown, PDF, and JSON exports for this market.

Open the diligence packet

Why this read

Why this rating

Composite 66 · Do not cite

2 measured3 heuristic1 pending
  • Coherenceheuristicweight 25.0

    No full-provenance CME signal is linked to this condition in the current ledger window; absence of a signal is not proof of coherence.

    • · no linked cme signal in window
    • · absence of signal not proof of coherence
    • · cme signal window days: 7
    • · recent full provenance signals: 143
    50+20.8
  • Executabilitypendingweight 20.0

    Executability scored as worse-of(spread, depth) from a single orderbook snapshot; the two were merged from the former liquidity + depth pillars to stop double-counting one correlated source.

    • · executability worse of spread depth
    • · spread: one_sided_orderbook_boundary
    • · spread: direct_bid_ask_spread_missing
    • · spread: visible $1k ladder slippage 0.29pp
    65no contrib
  • Resolution reliabilityheuristicweight 20.0

    Resolution source and rule text are present but not independently reviewed.

    • · resolution metadata present manual review pending
    70+23.3
  • Participant flowmeasuredweight 20.0

    11/32 accounts identifiable; identity coverage 66%; top-account flow share 36%; net directional flow net buy 49%. Descriptive participant flow only; not a skill or smart-money signal.

    • · below publishable sample floor
    • · edge score composite descriptive not skill
    • · high participant concentration
    • · unknown or low sample flow present
    n/ano contrib
  • Integrity risk screenheuristicweight 10.0

    Flow patterns clean; no wash-trade or coordination signals.

    • · top-3 wallets control 68% of notional flow
    • · flow events: 39
    • · distinct wallets: 32
    • · wash round trips: 0
    85+14.2
  • Audit completenessmeasuredweight 5.0

    5 linked artifacts; 0 missing hashes; 0 stale/failing sources.

    • · artifact hashes present
    • · source watermarks healthy
    100+8.3

How it adds up: composite = Σ(score × weight) / Σ(weight) across measured + heuristic pillars only. Pending and data-rights-blocked pillars are excluded from both numerator and denominator. Total contributing weight = 60.0.

Caveat: 1 pillar pending; the score will recompute as the substrate fills in.

Experimental rating caveat

Market Trust Cards are experimental market-quality diagnostics, not compliance certifications or validated credit ratings.

What travels with this read

Market Trust is a canary preview: verdict cutpoints are operator-set, and each read is a dated, descriptive diagnostic of market quality, not a prediction of the outcome and not a claim about what the probability should be. A prospective calibration test is filed and matures on resolved outcomes.

  • Hard cap: Participant-flow coverage is measured, but unknown flow remains material.
  • Current card issue: Not enough pillars on this card are measured yet.
  • Current card issue: Some pillars on this card are still gathering evidence.
  • Current card issue: The rating moves under leave-one-out or weight-perturbation checks.
  • absence of signal not proof of coherence
  • artifact hashes present

Cite this reading

Quote it verbatim. The number and its bound travel together; the method is frozen and the per-wallet table is public.

One-line stat

Convexly rates this polymarket market "The Memphis Classic: Xiyu Wang vs Caty McNally" as Do not cite, as of 2026-07-28 (UTC).

Citation

Per Convexly Market Trust, the polymarket market "The Memphis Classic: Xiyu Wang vs Caty McNally" is rated Do not cite as of 2026-07-28T19:31:10.921Z (UTC). The rating describes whether the quoted market price was a clean enough data object to cite at that timestamp. This citation is market diligence, not investment advice, not a trading instruction, not a forecast, and not proof that the market probability is correct. Daily read: https://www.convexly.app/markets/wta-wan-mcnally-2026-07-26

Canonical URL: https://www.convexly.app/markets/wta-wan-mcnally-2026-07-26

Boundary of this page

This daily read is market diligence, not investment advice, not a claim of absolute truth, and not proof that any trader should buy or sell. It answers whether this market price had enough substrate to cite, monitor, discount, or ignore at the as-of timestamp, with receipts attached in the diligence packet.