Market Trust diligence packet

Exact Score: Spain 3 - 3 Argentina?

DiscountCurrent daily snapshot
UseUse with caveatsDiscountDo not cite

One of four bands, strongest warning on the right

Too much of the trading came from wallets we cannot yet identify, so participant-flow coverage is uncertain.

Use only as a review target. Current-card issues must clear before this price is used as evidence.

Market quality

63 / 100

Interval 45-70

Evidence confidence

medium

70 / 100

Source health

source gate passed

1 sources | dropped 0

Audit chain

deb9a511d1...

row hash verified

Memo language

Convexly rates this polymarket market "Exact Score: Spain 3 - 3 Argentina?" as Discount. Use only as a review target. Current-card issues must clear before this price is used as evidence. Caveat to carry: participant quality elevated unknown flow. This is market diligence, not a trading instruction or proof that the market probability is correct.

Caveat to carry: participant quality elevated unknown flow.

Export
How to use this packet and what changes the verdict

Use this packet when

  • Use to explain why a market price should receive less weight than cleaner alternatives.
  • Use as a watch item while source, participant, or resolution evidence improves.

Do not use it as

  • A trading instruction.
  • Proof that the market probability is correct.
  • A manipulation accusation or person-level identity claim.

What changes the verdict

  • Clear hard cap: participant quality elevated unknown flow.
  • Clear hard cap: Participant-flow coverage is measured, but unknown flow remains material.
  • Clear current blocker: Not enough pillars on this card are measured yet.
How the score adds upWhy this verdict
3 measured | 3 heuristic | 0 pending

Why this rating

Composite 63 · Discount

3 measured3 heuristic0 pending
  • Coherenceheuristicweight 25.0

    No full-provenance CME signal is linked to this condition in the current ledger window; absence of a signal is not proof of coherence.

    • · no linked cme signal in window
    • · absence of signal not proof of coherence
    • · cme signal window days: 7
    • · recent full provenance signals: 171
    50+15.6
  • Executabilitymeasuredweight 20.0

    Executability scored as worse-of(spread, depth) from a single orderbook snapshot; the two were merged from the former liquidity + depth pillars to stop double-counting one correlated source.

    • · executability worse of spread depth
    • · spread: top-of-book spread 0.1c
    • · spread: pp-band-to-cents-band approximation in effect (depth_5pct_usd/2 per side); per-side decomposition pending substrate work
    • · spread: scorer_version:M2
    45+11.3
  • Resolution reliabilityheuristicweight 20.0

    Resolution source and rule text are present but not independently reviewed.

    • · resolution metadata present manual review pending
    70+17.5
  • Participant flowmeasuredweight 20.0

    8/14 accounts identifiable; identity coverage 50%; top-account flow share 13%; net directional flow net sell 100%. Descriptive participant flow only; not a skill or smart-money signal.

    • · below publishable sample floor
    • · current account score join
    • · edge score composite descriptive not skill
    • · high unknown flow share
    n/ano contrib
  • Integrity risk screenheuristicweight 10.0

    Flow patterns clean; no wash-trade or coordination signals.

    • · No manipulation patterns detected.
    • · flow events: 15
    • · distinct wallets: 14
    • · wash round trips: 0
    100+12.5
  • Audit completenessmeasuredweight 5.0

    5 linked artifacts; 0 missing hashes; 0 stale/failing sources.

    • · artifact hashes present
    • · source watermarks healthy
    100+6.3

How it adds up: composite = Σ(score × weight) / Σ(weight) across measured + heuristic pillars only. Pending and data-rights-blocked pillars are excluded from both numerator and denominator. Total contributing weight = 80.0.

Market identityWhat is being rated

Venue

polymarket

condition 0x417b5575a44e401c...

Category

Sports

used for coverage and validation breadth

Market status

active

venue-provided lifecycle state when available

Resolution rule

In the upcoming FIFA World Cup game between Spain and Argentina, scheduled for July 19, 2026 at 3:00 PM ET: This market will resolve based on the final score of the Spain vs. Argentina match originally scheduled for July 19, 2026 at 3:00 PM ET, considering only the result at the end of 90 minutes of regulation plus stoppage time; extra time and penalty shoot-outs are excluded. If the actual score is not one of the explicitly listed outcomes, the market resolves to "Any Other Score." If the match is postponed, the market will remain open until it is completed; if it is canceled with no make-up game, the market resolves to "0-0." The primary resolution source for this market is the official statistics of the event as recognized by the governing body or event organizers. However, if the governing body or event organizers have not published final match statistics within 2 hours after the event's conclusion, a consensus of credible reporting may be used instead. All markets will settle based on the official final result as recognized by the governing body or event organizers. Revisions to officially declared final scores made after market resolution will not be accounted for in determining the outcome.

card_id: mt-v02:polymarket:0x417b5575a44e401c7eb3748c42ae79e3a797e1f20926bbf369ec33f73a61c145:2026-07-16

market_id: 621f6803-17cb-4870-8ee3-d97f649dfeb8

venue_market_id: 0x417b5575a44e401c7eb3748c42ae79e3a797e1f20926bbf369ec33f73a61c145

resolution_source: 0x69c47De9D4D3Dad79590d61b9e05918E03775f24

Audit chainReceipt and verification

Convexly stores the card payload, removes the row_hash field, canonicalizes the remaining JSON, and recomputes the SHA-256 hash. This is the bridge from a readable verdict to a buyer-reviewable audit chain.

market-trust-v02:2026-07-16T20-15-09-589Z

method: market_trust_card_v0_2

row_hash: deb9a511d12ed694425fa1415cb2edb66e58dffe673ddb446d122d10b91b8b38

previous_row_hash: afa3c821fe561554c9d4f004f5fed686070fa2ec5c26184a86b91edd38b38c33

source_artifact_hashes: 1eae0f93ad5fc974fd43e3ea69b5e9867e441d0acb3970069b5f7040e7c23825, f474e5d8370103138743c59737ef62f28654b9058f236c237222041b386a643d

Verdict hashImmutable verdict archive

This verdict is archived as a canonical JSON object with a SHA-256 content hash. The hashed payload carries the methodology version (market_trust_card_v0_2), the canary_preview label, and a fixed boundary statement; none of them can be removed without changing the digest.

verdict archive sha256: bbd3239ac866460bf29d07e0df5e0b221f422555307e507e7229a68540f10af3

How to verify this hash
  1. Fetch the canonical archive bytes: https://www.convexly.app/api/market-trust/v0.2/0x417b5575a44e401c7eb3748c42ae79e3a797e1f20926bbf369ec33f73a61c145/archive?venue=polymarket&format=canonical
  2. Recompute the digest locally, for example: curl -s "https://www.convexly.app/api/market-trust/v0.2/0x417b5575a44e401c7eb3748c42ae79e3a797e1f20926bbf369ec33f73a61c145/archive?venue=polymarket&format=canonical" | shasum -a 256
  3. Compare your digest to archive_sha256 in the JSON response at https://www.convexly.app/api/market-trust/v0.2/0x417b5575a44e401c7eb3748c42ae79e3a797e1f20926bbf369ec33f73a61c145/archive?venue=polymarket. Matching digests mean the archived verdict content is byte-for-byte unchanged.
  4. Cross-check card_row_hash against the stored full-card receipt at https://www.convexly.app/api/market-trust/v0.2/0x417b5575a44e401c7eb3748c42ae79e3a797e1f20926bbf369ec33f73a61c145/verify?venue=polymarket.

Stored v0.2 cards are frozen scorecards: a re-score inserts a new row with a new card_id and records the prior receipt in previous_row_hash, and the filed calibration design binds Convexly to never mutate frozen card-time rows. The archive is a deterministic serialization of one stored row, so the same row always reproduces the same archive_sha256.

Participant and integrity screenWho shaped the price

Participant-flow screens flagged concentration, unknown-flow, or low-edge-flow conditions for review. This is an integrity-risk screen, not a manipulation accusation and not person-level identity resolution.

Scored flow

49.7%

8 scored accounts

Unknown flow

50.3%

higher unknown flow lowers confidence

Participants

14

public accounts observed

Top flow share

13.4%

concentration diagnostic

high unknown flow shareunknown or low sample flow present

Not claiming: wash-trading detection; sybil detection; manipulation-free market.

Market Fitness - pre-trade diligence (experimental)

5 of 6 diagnostics have a derivable observable on this stored card; 1 are insufficient_data. An insufficient_data row means the card lacks that input, not that the check passed.

Depth and slippage at size is a Researcher feature.

The resolution-reliability, manipulation, and basis-risk reads below are open. To see the fill cost at $100 / $1k / $10k and the executability detail, upgrade to Researcher.

Depth durability

measured

insufficient data

At-size depth and slippage detail is a Researcher feature. Upgrade at /pricing to see fill cost at size.

Observable: Executability pillar: worse-of(top-of-book spread, modeled price impact) from the latest inspected orderbook snapshot at 2026-07-16T20:12:49.41+00:00

Caveats: derived from a single orderbook snapshot; durability across time is not yet measured on this card; descriptive diagnostic from operator-set scoring that is not calibrated; no interval exists for this value, so none is shown rather than fabricated; gated detail requires researcher

Spread and price impact

measured

insufficient data

At-size depth and slippage detail is a Researcher feature. Upgrade at /pricing to see fill cost at size.

Observable: Top-of-book spread (price points) and modeled price impact for a fixed notional, from the latest inspected orderbook snapshot

Caveats: spread cost over a holding period is not modeled; this is a single-snapshot read; descriptive diagnostic from operator-set scoring that is not calibrated; no interval exists for this value, so none is shown rather than fabricated; gated detail requires researcher

Time to resolution

insufficient data

insufficient data

Venue lifecycle status on the card: active. No end date is stored.

Observable: Venue-supplied market end date or close time stored on the card

Missing input: The v0.2 card schema does not store an end date or close time, so time to resolution cannot be derived from this card.

Resolution reliability

heuristic

70 / 100 (descriptive)

Resolution source and rule text are present but not independently reviewed. Resolution rule text is stored on the card.

Observable: Resolution reliability pillar: review of the resolution source (0x69c47De9D4D3Dad79590d61b9e05918E03775f24) and stored resolution rule text

Caveats: resolved-outcome dispute history is not joined on this card; the read covers resolution source and rule text only; descriptive diagnostic from operator-set scoring that is not calibrated; no interval exists for this value, so none is shown rather than fabricated

Concentration exposure

measured

13.4%

Top account flow share 13.4%; unknown flow share 50.3%; scored notional share 49.7%. Flags: high unknown flow share, unknown or low sample flow present.

Observable: Participant-flow concentration from the card's integrity screen: top account flow share, unknown flow share, scored notional share

Caveats: concentration diagnostic, not a manipulation finding and not person-level identity resolution; descriptive diagnostic from operator-set scoring that is not calibrated; no interval exists for this value, so none is shown rather than fabricated

Basis-risk note

descriptive

structural note

This market settles as a binary event contract: it pays a fixed amount on one discrete resolution. Offsetting a continuous exposure with a binary payoff leaves residual basis risk by construction, and binary payoffs will generally fail the ASC 815 80-125% dollar-offset band used for hedge-accounting treatment, so a position that works as an economic offset can still be carried as mark-to-market P&L. This is a structural description of the contract type, not a statement about any party's exposure.

Observable: Contract payoff structure (binary event contract) and the resolution rule text stored on the card

Caveats: structural description of the contract type, not accounting or legal advice

Published deliberately as a component table with no single combined number. Read each component against the observable it derives from; an insufficient_data row means the stored card lacks that input, not that the check passed.

These diagnostics describe observable market-quality measurements for one market. They are not investment advice, not a trading instruction, not a recommendation to take or offset any exposure with this or any market, and not a statement about any person or their positions.

instrument_fitness_diagnostics_v0_1

Source freshness windowIngest status

The current ingest window is clean enough for review. This is freshness reporting, not an uptime SLA.

Latest orderbook

2026-07-16T20:12:49.410Z

most recent orderbook evidence attached to this card

Sources

1

1 healthy | 0 degraded | 0 stale | 0 failing

Dropped events

0

nonzero dropped events block current-language claims

Observed age

5s

oldest observed source watermark

Ingested age

582ms

oldest ingest watermark

Validation stateCanary vs v1

Canary pipeline

blocked

Current card has source, evidence, or robustness issues to clear.

Public v1 promotion

4 public v1 validation gates still open.

Canary readiness says the current batch can be reviewed. Public v1 promotion waits for coverage, clean source-health windows, resolved outcomes, and formula-freeze evidence.

Read the promotion evidence contract
  • Not enough pillars on this card are measured yet.
  • The rating moves under leave-one-out or weight-perturbation checks.
  • 14 consecutive clean source-health days have not yet been observed.
  • 30 current cards across 3 market categories are not yet reached.
  • The scoring formula must be frozen before validation runs.
  • At least one resolved-outcome row is still needed in the validation ledger.
Top caveatsWhat travels with the score
  • Hard cap: participant quality elevated unknown flow.
  • Hard cap: Participant-flow coverage is measured, but unknown flow remains material.
  • Current card issue: Not enough pillars on this card are measured yet.
  • Current card issue: The rating moves under leave-one-out or weight-perturbation checks.
  • No manipulation patterns detected.
  • absence of signal not proof of coherence
Before stable v1Validation requirements
  • 14 consecutive clean source-health days have not yet been observed.
  • 30 current cards across 3 market categories are not yet reached.
  • The scoring formula must be frozen before validation runs.
  • At least one resolved-outcome row is still needed in the validation ledger.
External contextNon-scoring provenance

No external baseline family is mapped for this market yet.

No external baseline family is mapped for this market yet.

External context is non-scoring in v0.2. Market Trust still measures market-quality substrate, not absolute truth against outside forecasts.

Full seven-pillar evidence grid

Coherence

weight 25 · heuristic

50 / 100

No full-provenance CME signal is linked to this condition in the current ledger window; absence of a signal is not proof of coherence.

no linked cme signal in windowabsence of signal not proof of coherencecme signal window days:7

Executability

weight 20 · measured

45 / 100

Executability scored as worse-of(spread, depth) from a single orderbook snapshot; the two were merged from the former liquidity + depth pillars to stop double-counting one correlated source.

executability worse of spread depthspread:top-of-book spread 0.1cspread:pp-band-to-cents-band approximation in effect (depth 5pct usd/2 per side); per-side decomposition pending substrate work

Resolution reliability

weight 20 · heuristic

70 / 100

Resolution source and rule text are present but not independently reviewed.

resolution metadata present manual review pending

Participant flow

weight 20 · measured

pending

8/14 accounts identifiable; identity coverage 50%; top-account flow share 13%; net directional flow net sell 100%. Descriptive participant flow only; not a skill or smart-money signal.

below publishable sample floorcurrent account score joinedge score composite descriptive not skill

Integrity risk screen

weight 10 · heuristic

100 / 100

Flow patterns clean; no wash-trade or coordination signals.

No manipulation patterns detected.flow events:15distinct wallets:14

Audit completeness

weight 5 · measured

100 / 100

5 linked artifacts; 0 missing hashes; 0 stale/failing sources.

artifact hashes presentsource watermarks healthy
Coherence blockLinked-market consistency

No full-provenance CME signal is linked to this condition in the current ledger window; absence of a signal is not proof of coherence.

Score

50

heuristic evidence

Source refs

0

linked-market or CME artifacts

no linked cme signal in window absence of signal not proof of coherence cme signal window days:7 recent full provenance signals:171

Robustness blockSensitivity and drivers

Sensitivity verdict

moves

leave-one-out and weight perturbation

Leave-one-out

58-69

score range

Weight perturbation

62-64

score range

Drivers

3

largest weighted contributors

  • Coherence is heuristic, not fully measured.
  • Coherence scores below 60 and needs stronger evidence before the verdict can improve.
  • Executability scores below 60 and needs stronger evidence before the verdict can improve.
  • Resolution reliability is heuristic, not fully measured.
  • Integrity screen is heuristic, not fully measured.

Live market integrity read is a Trader feature

Trader ($499/mo) unlocks an on-demand participation-concentration read on any market — HHI of wallet volume shares with a confidence interval on every estimate, plus a round-trip self-churn share, computed live from the current flow tape. Descriptive structure with receipts, not a manipulation call.

Boundary of the packet

This packet is market diligence, not investment advice, not a claim of absolute truth, and not proof that any trader should buy or sell. It answers whether the market price has enough substrate to cite, monitor, discount, or ignore with receipts attached.