Market Trust diligence packet

Will Waymo launch in New York City by June 30 2026?

One-screen answer to a buyer's question: can this market price be cited, used with caveats, discounted, or ignored? The packet separates the verdict from evidence confidence, source freshness, participant quality, integrity screens, and receipts.

Do not citeCurrent daily snapshot

So what?

Use only as a review target. Current-card issues must clear before this price is used as evidence.

Memo language

Convexly rates this polymarket market "Will Waymo launch in New York City by June 30 2026?" as Do not cite. Use only as a review target. Current-card issues must clear before this price is used as evidence. Caveat to carry: Too much participant flow is unknown while participant-quality evidence is still pending. This is market diligence, not a trading instruction or proof that the market probability is correct.

Caveat to carry: Too much participant flow is unknown while participant-quality evidence is still pending.

Use this packet when

  • Use to explain why this market should stay out of a citation set for now.
  • Use as a recovery checklist for source freshness, coherence, depth, or evidence gaps.

Do not use it as

  • A trading instruction.
  • Proof that the market probability is correct.
  • A manipulation accusation or person-level identity claim.

What changes the verdict

  • Clear hard cap: Too much participant flow is unknown while participant-quality evidence is still pending.
  • Clear hard cap: The integrity screen is still heuristic and scores below 60.
  • Clear current blocker: Some pillars on this card are still gathering evidence.

Market quality

56 / 100

Interval 30-64

Evidence confidence

medium

62 / 100

Source health

source gate passed

1 sources | dropped 0

Audit chain

7e3a9adb75...

row hash verified

Why this verdict

participant quality pending high unknown flow

4 measured | 2 heuristic | 1 pending

Why this rating

Composite 56 · Do not cite

4 measured2 heuristic1 pending
  • Coherencemeasuredweight 20.0

    2 full-provenance Coherent Markets Engine signals linked to this condition; 11 price-observation checkpoints recorded.

    • · full_provenance_cme_signal_linked
    • · signal_price_observations_linked
    • · no_observed_checkpoint_yet
    30+7.5
  • Liquiditymeasuredweight 15.0

    Tight top-of-book; small to mid orders trade close to mid.

    • · top-of-book spread 3.5c
    • · spread is 4% of mid — tight relative to price
    • · pp-band-to-cents-band approximation in effect (depth_5pct_usd/2 per side); per-side decomposition pending substrate work
    • · scorer_version:M2
    80+15.0
  • Depthmeasuredweight 15.0

    Workable depth for retail size; institutional size will move price.

    • · min-side depth $17,747 within ±5c of mid
    • · bid $17,747 / ask $17,747
    • · pp-band-to-cents-band approximation in effect (depth_5pct_usd/2 per side); per-side decomposition pending substrate work
    • · scorer_version:M2
    75+14.1
  • Resolution reliabilityheuristicweight 15.0

    Resolution source and rule text are present but not independently reviewed.

    • · resolution_metadata_present_manual_review_pending
    70+13.1
  • Participant qualitypendingweight 20.0

    Participant-quality inputs exist but do not meet coverage floors.

    • · below_publishable_sample_floor
    • · high_participant_concentration
    • · high_unknown_flow_share
    • · insufficient_scored_accounts
    no contrib
  • Integrity risk screenheuristicweight 10.0

    Top account flow share is 100%.

    • · high_participant_concentration
    0no contrib
  • Audit completenessmeasuredweight 5.0

    5 linked artifacts; 0 missing hashes; 0 stale/failing sources.

    • · artifact_hashes_present
    • · source_watermarks_healthy
    100+6.3

How it adds up: composite = Σ(score × weight) / Σ(weight) across measured + heuristic pillars only. Pending and data-rights-blocked pillars are excluded from both numerator and denominator. Total contributing weight = 80.0.

Caveat: 1 pillar pending — the score will recompute as the substrate fills in.

What is being rated

Market identity

Venue

polymarket

condition 0xc3ff5462722d8033...

Category

unmapped

used for coverage and validation breadth

Market status

active

venue-provided lifecycle state when available

Resolution rule

This market will resolve to “Yes” if Waymo begins offering its ride-hailing service to the general public within the listed city by June 30, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise this market will resolve to "No". Any taxi service available to the general public which operates without a human driver actively controlling the vehicle will count, regardless of membership or other financial restrictions. A qualifying launch requires the general public be able to hail a Waymo vehicle within the listed city \ through the Waymo One app or another official Waymo platform (such as a dedicated website or integrated partner app like Uber). Limited pilot programs, internal employee testing, or invite-only service will not qualify. The primary resolution source is official information from Waymo (see: https://waymo.com/rides/c), however a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.

card_id: mt-v02:polymarket:0xc3ff5462722d803352fb9e89d90c0bef29d01cb9e1c0ceae5b2ed2fd219253bd:2026-05-26

market_id: 1433ffc7-6694-4af7-af7e-bdc8f9ccfcee

venue_market_id: 0xc3ff5462722d803352fb9e89d90c0bef29d01cb9e1c0ceae5b2ed2fd219253bd

resolution_source: 0x65070BE91477460D8A7AeEb94ef92fe056C2f2A7

Receipt and export

Audit chain

Convexly stores the card payload, removes the row_hash field, canonicalizes the remaining JSON, and recomputes the SHA-256 hash. This is the bridge from a readable verdict to a buyer-reviewable audit chain.

market-trust-v02:2026-05-26T01-46-46-980Z

method: market_trust_card_v0_2

row_hash: 7e3a9adb75cd124812027c4dbe2e94cc3896f2edbfb6612b5183a355c67e4c6b

previous_row_hash: 55e7391b7a1f9d644d9c9b0519cb842d69dade97bbb17e66327b830a1eb15b71

source_artifact_hashes: 2395e3f38c3206d084ca1444ed6987f65d48a7dac62853126f98dcd7cdc68a14, 235b044052c6cdc36cf1cc9541f83dc896884504d3509985db5540029bea573a

Who shaped the price

Participant and integrity screen

Participant-flow screens flagged concentration, unknown-flow, or low-edge-flow conditions for review. This is an integrity-risk screen, not a manipulation accusation and not person-level identity resolution.

Scored flow

0%

0 scored accounts

Unknown flow

100%

higher unknown flow lowers confidence

Participants

1

public accounts observed

Top flow share

100%

concentration diagnostic

high participant concentrationhigh unknown flow sharethin participant countunknown or low sample flow present

Not claiming: wash-trading detection; sybil detection; manipulation-free market.

Ingest status

Source freshness window

The current ingest window is clean enough for review. This is freshness reporting, not an uptime SLA.

Latest orderbook

2026-05-26T01:46:45.593Z

most recent orderbook evidence attached to this card

Sources

1

1 healthy | 0 degraded | 0 stale | 0 failing

Dropped events

0

nonzero dropped events block current-language claims

Observed age

1s

oldest observed source watermark

Ingested age

1s

oldest ingest watermark

Canary vs v1

Validation state

Canary pipeline

blocked

Current card has source, evidence, or robustness issues to clear.

Public v1 promotion

4 public v1 validation gates still open.

Canary readiness says the current batch can be reviewed. Public v1 promotion waits for coverage, clean source-health windows, resolved outcomes, and formula-freeze evidence.

Read the promotion evidence contract
  • Some pillars on this card are still gathering evidence.
  • The rating moves under leave-one-out or weight-perturbation checks.
  • 14 consecutive clean source-health days have not yet been observed.
  • 30 current cards across 3 market categories are not yet reached.
  • The scoring formula must be frozen before validation runs.
  • At least one resolved-outcome row is still needed in the validation ledger.

What travels with the score

Top caveats

  • Hard cap: Too much participant flow is unknown while participant-quality evidence is still pending.
  • Hard cap: The integrity screen is still heuristic and scores below 60.
  • Current card issue: Some pillars on this card are still gathering evidence.
  • Current card issue: The rating moves under leave-one-out or weight-perturbation checks.
  • artifact_hashes_present
  • below_publishable_sample_floor

Validation requirements

Before stable v1

  • 14 consecutive clean source-health days have not yet been observed.
  • 30 current cards across 3 market categories are not yet reached.
  • The scoring formula must be frozen before validation runs.
  • At least one resolved-outcome row is still needed in the validation ledger.

Non-scoring provenance

External context

No external baseline family is mapped for this market yet.

No external baseline family is mapped for this market yet.

External context is non-scoring in v0.2. Market Trust still measures market-quality substrate, not absolute truth against outside forecasts.

Rating substrate

Seven-pillar evidence grid

Coherence

weight 20 · measured

30 / 100

2 full-provenance Coherent Markets Engine signals linked to this condition; 11 price-observation checkpoints recorded.

full provenance cme signal linkedsignal price observations linkedno observed checkpoint yet

Liquidity

weight 15 · measured

80 / 100

Tight top-of-book; small to mid orders trade close to mid.

top-of-book spread 3.5cspread is 4% of mid — tight relative to pricepp-band-to-cents-band approximation in effect (depth 5pct usd/2 per side); per-side decomposition pending substrate work

Depth

weight 15 · measured

75 / 100

Workable depth for retail size; institutional size will move price.

min-side depth $17,747 within ±5c of midbid $17,747 / ask $17,747pp-band-to-cents-band approximation in effect (depth 5pct usd/2 per side); per-side decomposition pending substrate work

Resolution reliability

weight 15 · heuristic

70 / 100

Resolution source and rule text are present but not independently reviewed.

resolution metadata present manual review pending

Participant quality

weight 20 · pending

pending

Participant-quality inputs exist but do not meet coverage floors.

below publishable sample floorhigh participant concentrationhigh unknown flow share

Integrity risk screen

weight 10 · heuristic

0 / 100

Top account flow share is 100%.

high participant concentration

Audit completeness

weight 5 · measured

100 / 100

5 linked artifacts; 0 missing hashes; 0 stale/failing sources.

artifact hashes presentsource watermarks healthy

Linked-market consistency

Coherence block

2 full-provenance Coherent Markets Engine signals linked to this condition; 11 price-observation checkpoints recorded.

Score

30

measured evidence

Source refs

2

linked-market or CME artifacts

full provenance cme signal linked signal price observations linked no observed checkpoint yet

Sensitivity and drivers

Robustness block

Sensitivity verdict

moves

leave-one-out and weight perturbation

Leave-one-out

50-65

score range

Weight perturbation

55-57

score range

Drivers

3

largest weighted contributors

  • Coherence scores below 60 and needs stronger evidence before the verdict can improve.
  • Resolution reliability is heuristic, not fully measured.
  • Participant quality is pending, not fully measured.
  • Integrity screen is heuristic, not fully measured.
  • Integrity screen scores below 60 and needs stronger evidence before the verdict can improve.

Boundary of the packet

This packet is market diligence, not investment advice, not a claim of absolute truth, and not proof that any trader should buy or sell. It answers whether the market price has enough substrate to cite, monitor, discount, or ignore with receipts attached.