Market Trust diligence packet

Will Arsenal FC win on 2026-05-18?

One-screen answer to a buyer's question: can this market price be cited, used with caveats, discounted, or ignored? The packet separates the verdict from evidence confidence, source freshness, participant quality, integrity screens, and receipts.

Do not citeStale (7.4d old)

So what?

Monitor, but do not cite as current. The evidence is useful as an archived read until the data freshness window refreshes.

Freshness gate: Diligence packet is stale for current product claims. Treat this as archived evidence and wait for a refresh before demos or outreach.

Memo language

Convexly rates this polymarket market "Will Arsenal FC win on 2026-05-18?" as Do not cite. Use only as a review target. Current-card issues must clear before this price is used as evidence. Caveat to carry: Too much participant flow is unknown while participant-quality evidence is still pending. This is market diligence, not a trading instruction or proof that the market probability is correct.

Caveat to carry: Too much participant flow is unknown while participant-quality evidence is still pending.

Use this packet when

  • Use to explain why this market should stay out of a citation set for now.
  • Use as a recovery checklist for source freshness, coherence, depth, or evidence gaps.

Do not use it as

  • A trading instruction.
  • Proof that the market probability is correct.
  • A manipulation accusation or person-level identity claim.

What changes the verdict

  • Clear hard cap: Too much participant flow is unknown while participant-quality evidence is still pending.
  • Clear current blocker: Not enough pillars on this card are measured yet.
  • Clear current blocker: Some pillars on this card are still gathering evidence.

Market quality

40 / 100

Interval 0-54

Evidence confidence

low

43 / 100

Source health

source gate passed

1 sources | dropped 0

Audit chain

699ee3276e...

row hash verified

Why this verdict

participant quality pending high unknown flow

2 measured | 1 heuristic | 4 pending

Why this rating

Composite 40 · Do not cite

2 measured1 heuristic4 pending
  • Coherencependingweight 20.0

    Coherence evidence not linked yet.

    • · missing_input
    no contrib
  • Liquiditypendingweight 15.0

    Top-of-book unavailable; pillar pending.

    • · No bid/ask snapshot in the lookback window.
    • · pp-band-to-cents-band approximation in effect (depth_5pct_usd/2 per side); per-side decomposition pending substrate work
    • · scorer_version:M2
    0no contrib
  • Depthpendingweight 15.0

    Depth data unavailable; pillar pending.

    • · No depth snapshot in the lookback window.
    • · pp-band-to-cents-band approximation in effect (depth_5pct_usd/2 per side); per-side decomposition pending substrate work
    • · scorer_version:M2
    0no contrib
  • Resolution reliabilityheuristicweight 15.0

    Resolution source and rule text are present but not independently reviewed.

    • · resolution_metadata_present_manual_review_pending
    70+35.0
  • Participant qualitypendingweight 20.0

    Participant-quality inputs exist but do not meet coverage floors.

    • · below_publishable_sample_floor
    • · current_account_score_join
    • · high_unknown_flow_share
    • · insufficient_scored_accounts
    no contrib
  • Integrity risk screenmeasuredweight 10.0

    Flow patterns clean; no wash-trade or coordination signals.

    • · top-3 wallets control 61% of notional flow
    • · flow_events:76
    • · distinct_wallets:62
    • · wash_round_trips:0
    85+28.3
  • Audit completenessmeasuredweight 5.0

    15 linked artifacts; 0 missing hashes; 0 stale/failing sources.

    • · artifact_hashes_present
    • · source_watermarks_healthy
    100+16.7

How it adds up: composite = Σ(score × weight) / Σ(weight) across measured + heuristic pillars only. Pending and data-rights-blocked pillars are excluded from both numerator and denominator. Total contributing weight = 30.0.

Caveat: 4 pillars pending — the score will recompute as the substrate fills in.

What is being rated

Market identity

Venue

polymarket

condition 0x95819f1669d9a6a5...

Category

unmapped

used for coverage and validation breadth

Market status

active

venue-provided lifecycle state when available

Resolution rule

In the upcoming game, scheduled for May 18, 2026 If Arsenal FC wins, this market will resolve to "Yes". Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No". If the game is postponed, this market will remain open until the game has been completed. If the game is canceled entirely, with no make-up game, this market will resolve "No". This market refers only to the outcome within the first 90 minutes of regular play plus stoppage time. The primary resolution source for this market is the official statistics of the event as recognized by the governing body or event organizers. However, if the governing body or event organizers have not published final match statistics within 2 hours after the event's conclusion, a consensus of credible reporting may be used instead.

card_id: mt-v02:polymarket:0x95819f1669d9a6a5c54b19f02ffcf768ac5208b7424c161b7da046b53e707b93:2026-05-18

market_id: 597d46f1-c072-4896-a020-39487a027541

venue_market_id: 0x95819f1669d9a6a5c54b19f02ffcf768ac5208b7424c161b7da046b53e707b93

resolution_source: https://www.premierleague.com/

Receipt and export

Audit chain

Convexly stores the card payload, removes the row_hash field, canonicalizes the remaining JSON, and recomputes the SHA-256 hash. This is the bridge from a readable verdict to a buyer-reviewable audit chain.

market-trust-v02:2026-05-18T21-21-34-583Z

method: market_trust_card_v0_2

row_hash: 699ee3276e286922b958735f48486ea7787d0aff5ba1dd3912fdb1b2ed5f1d4b

previous_row_hash: 146652465c62f2c06f9465ca9fcc731e6f69e47744c73f2bad10cb9f30d6b786

source_artifact_hashes: 99faf3f881b1ae3cc7027f552a0618276603ed027c0549d90d2f75ea6628c748, af317c6cea8c0bd578cd41ec2c4803366dc0a062745b34409bed644e5d165261

Who shaped the price

Participant and integrity screen

Participant-flow screens flagged concentration, unknown-flow, or low-edge-flow conditions for review. This is an integrity-risk screen, not a manipulation accusation and not person-level identity resolution.

Scored flow

5.2%

2 scored accounts

Unknown flow

94.8%

higher unknown flow lowers confidence

Participants

62

public accounts observed

Top flow share

32.8%

concentration diagnostic

high unknown flow sharelow edge flow presentmoderate participant concentrationunknown or low sample flow present

Not claiming: wash-trading detection; sybil detection; manipulation-free market.

Ingest status

Source freshness window

The current ingest window is clean enough for review. This is freshness reporting, not an uptime SLA.

Latest orderbook

2026-05-18T21:20:53.037Z

most recent orderbook evidence attached to this card

Sources

1

1 healthy | 0 degraded | 0 stale | 0 failing

Dropped events

0

nonzero dropped events block current-language claims

Observed age

6m

oldest observed source watermark

Ingested age

6m

oldest ingest watermark

Canary vs v1

Validation state

Canary pipeline

blocked

Current card has source, evidence, or robustness issues to clear.

Public v1 promotion

4 public v1 validation gates still open.

Canary readiness says the current batch can be reviewed. Public v1 promotion waits for coverage, clean source-health windows, resolved outcomes, and formula-freeze evidence.

Read the promotion evidence contract
  • Not enough pillars on this card are measured yet.
  • Some pillars on this card are still gathering evidence.
  • The rating moves under leave-one-out or weight-perturbation checks.
  • 14 consecutive clean source-health days have not yet been observed.
  • 30 current cards across 3 market categories are not yet reached.
  • The scoring formula must be frozen before validation runs.
  • At least one resolved-outcome row is still needed in the validation ledger.

What travels with the score

Top caveats

  • Hard cap: Too much participant flow is unknown while participant-quality evidence is still pending.
  • Current card issue: Not enough pillars on this card are measured yet.
  • Current card issue: Some pillars on this card are still gathering evidence.
  • Current card issue: The rating moves under leave-one-out or weight-perturbation checks.
  • No bid/ask snapshot in the lookback window.
  • No depth snapshot in the lookback window.

Validation requirements

Before stable v1

  • 14 consecutive clean source-health days have not yet been observed.
  • 30 current cards across 3 market categories are not yet reached.
  • The scoring formula must be frozen before validation runs.
  • At least one resolved-outcome row is still needed in the validation ledger.

Non-scoring provenance

External context

No external baseline family is mapped for this market yet.

No external baseline family is mapped for this market yet.

External context is non-scoring in v0.2. Market Trust still measures market-quality substrate, not absolute truth against outside forecasts.

Rating substrate

Seven-pillar evidence grid

Coherence

weight 20 · pending

pending

Coherence evidence not linked yet.

missing input

Liquidity

weight 15 · pending

0 / 100

Top-of-book unavailable; pillar pending.

No bid/ask snapshot in the lookback window.pp-band-to-cents-band approximation in effect (depth 5pct usd/2 per side); per-side decomposition pending substrate workscorer version:M2

Depth

weight 15 · pending

0 / 100

Depth data unavailable; pillar pending.

No depth snapshot in the lookback window.pp-band-to-cents-band approximation in effect (depth 5pct usd/2 per side); per-side decomposition pending substrate workscorer version:M2

Resolution reliability

weight 15 · heuristic

70 / 100

Resolution source and rule text are present but not independently reviewed.

resolution metadata present manual review pending

Participant quality

weight 20 · pending

pending

Participant-quality inputs exist but do not meet coverage floors.

below publishable sample floorcurrent account score joinhigh unknown flow share

Integrity risk screen

weight 10 · measured

85 / 100

Flow patterns clean; no wash-trade or coordination signals.

top-3 wallets control 61% of notional flowflow events:76distinct wallets:62

Audit completeness

weight 5 · measured

100 / 100

15 linked artifacts; 0 missing hashes; 0 stale/failing sources.

artifact hashes presentsource watermarks healthy

Linked-market consistency

Coherence block

Coherence evidence not linked yet.

Score

pending

pending evidence

Source refs

0

linked-market or CME artifacts

missing input

Sensitivity and drivers

Robustness block

Sensitivity verdict

moves

leave-one-out and weight perturbation

Leave-one-out

30-53

score range

Weight perturbation

38-42

score range

Drivers

3

largest weighted contributors

  • Coherence is pending, not fully measured.
  • Liquidity is pending, not fully measured.
  • Liquidity scores below 60 and needs stronger evidence before the verdict can improve.
  • Depth is pending, not fully measured.
  • Depth scores below 60 and needs stronger evidence before the verdict can improve.
  • Resolution reliability is heuristic, not fully measured.

Boundary of the packet

This packet is market diligence, not investment advice, not a claim of absolute truth, and not proof that any trader should buy or sell. It answers whether the market price has enough substrate to cite, monitor, discount, or ignore with receipts attached.