Market Trust diligence packet

Will Trump say "Iran" during events with Xi Jinping?

One-screen answer to a buyer's question: can this market price be cited, used with caveats, discounted, or ignored? The packet separates the verdict from evidence confidence, source freshness, participant quality, integrity screens, and receipts.

Do not citeStale (8.3d old)

So what?

Monitor, but do not cite as current. The evidence is useful as an archived read until the data freshness window refreshes.

Freshness gate: Diligence packet is stale for current product claims. Treat this as archived evidence and wait for a refresh before demos or outreach.

Memo language

Convexly rates this polymarket market "Will Trump say "Iran" during events with Xi Jinping?" as Do not cite. Use only as a review target. Current-card issues must clear before this price is used as evidence. Caveat to carry: Too much participant flow is unknown while participant-quality evidence is still pending. This is market diligence, not a trading instruction or proof that the market probability is correct.

Caveat to carry: Too much participant flow is unknown while participant-quality evidence is still pending.

Use this packet when

  • Use to explain why this market should stay out of a citation set for now.
  • Use as a recovery checklist for source freshness, coherence, depth, or evidence gaps.

Do not use it as

  • A trading instruction.
  • Proof that the market probability is correct.
  • A manipulation accusation or person-level identity claim.

What changes the verdict

  • Clear hard cap: Too much participant flow is unknown while participant-quality evidence is still pending.
  • Clear current blocker: Not enough pillars on this card are measured yet.
  • Clear current blocker: Some pillars on this card are still gathering evidence.

Market quality

72 / 100

Interval 33-84

Evidence confidence

low

48 / 100

Source health

source gate passed

1 sources | dropped 0

Audit chain

1bf8b55a72...

row hash verified

Why this verdict

participant quality pending high unknown flow

2 measured | 3 heuristic | 2 pending

Why this rating

Composite 72 · Do not cite

2 measured3 heuristic2 pending
  • Coherenceheuristicweight 20.0

    No full-provenance CME signal is linked to this condition in the current ledger window; absence of a signal is not proof of coherence.

    • · no_linked_cme_signal_in_window
    • · absence_of_signal_not_proof_of_coherence
    • · cme_signal_window_days:7
    • · recent_full_provenance_signals:250
    50+14.3
  • Liquidityheuristicweight 15.0

    One-sided visible ladder; direct spread unavailable, so liquidity is capped and caveated.

    • · one_sided_orderbook_boundary
    • · direct_bid_ask_spread_missing
    • · visible $1k ladder slippage 0pp
    • · scorer_version:M2
    65+13.9
  • Depthmeasuredweight 15.0

    $1k visible-ladder slippage estimate is 0pp.

    • · visible_ladder_slippage_measured
    100+21.4
  • Resolution reliabilityheuristicweight 15.0

    Resolution source and rule text are present but not independently reviewed.

    • · resolution_metadata_present_manual_review_pending
    70+15.0
  • Participant qualitypendingweight 20.0

    Participant-quality inputs exist but do not meet coverage floors.

    • · below_publishable_sample_floor
    • · high_participant_concentration
    • · high_unknown_flow_share
    • · insufficient_scored_accounts
    no contrib
  • Integrity risk screenpendingweight 10.0

    Mild concentration or coordination signals; review before citing.

    • · top-3 wallets control 100% of notional flow
    • · flow_events:9
    • · distinct_wallets:9
    • · wash_round_trips:0
    75no contrib
  • Audit completenessmeasuredweight 5.0

    5 linked artifacts; 0 missing hashes; 0 stale/failing sources.

    • · artifact_hashes_present
    • · source_watermarks_healthy
    100+7.1

How it adds up: composite = Σ(score × weight) / Σ(weight) across measured + heuristic pillars only. Pending and data-rights-blocked pillars are excluded from both numerator and denominator. Total contributing weight = 70.0.

Caveat: 2 pillars pending — the score will recompute as the substrate fills in.

What is being rated

Market identity

Venue

polymarket

condition 0xaa145cf5714455f5...

Category

unmapped

used for coverage and validation breadth

Market status

active

venue-provided lifecycle state when available

Resolution rule

Donald Trump is scheduled to meet with Xi Jinping from May 14 to May 15, 2026 (https://www.cnn.com/2026/05/04/china/china-us-talks-iran-intl-hnk). This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump says the listed term during his appearance at events featuring Xi Jinping from May 14 through May 15, 2026 (Beijing Time). Otherwise, the market will resolve to "No". Plural and possessive forms of the listed term will count toward the resolution of this market regardless of context; however, other forms will NOT count. Instances where the term is used in a compound word will count regardless of context (e.g. joyful is not a compound word for "joy," however "killjoy" is a compounding of the words "kill" and "joy"). If this market requires a specified number of mentions of a person’s first or last name, a full-name mention will count as one mention (e.g., if a market is about “Joe / Biden 5+ times,” a mention of “Joe Biden” will count once). AI-generated audio or video will not count toward this market's resolution. This market is explicitly about events featuring both Donald Trump and Xi Jinping from May 14 through May 15, 2026 (Beijing Time). All such events featuring both on these dates count. Speeches, events, or comments which feature one named individual but not the other, will not qualify toward this market's resolution. If the events contain a Q&A, it will count toward the resolution of this market. If this visit is definitively cancelled, or otherwise is not aired by May 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET, this market will resolve to "No". The resolution source will be video of the events. Only remarks which are broadcast or streamed live will count toward this market's resolution.

card_id: mt-v02:polymarket:0xaa145cf5714455f546afe53037b8712df749ba96c04820c2d41f37f877f29697:2026-05-22

market_id: 33c7d068-2bcf-471b-b6d8-cf0b27f37cfd

venue_market_id: 0xaa145cf5714455f546afe53037b8712df749ba96c04820c2d41f37f877f29697

resolution_source: 0x65070BE91477460D8A7AeEb94ef92fe056C2f2A7

Receipt and export

Audit chain

Convexly stores the card payload, removes the row_hash field, canonicalizes the remaining JSON, and recomputes the SHA-256 hash. This is the bridge from a readable verdict to a buyer-reviewable audit chain.

market-trust-v02:2026-05-22T22-16-41-588Z

method: market_trust_card_v0_2

row_hash: 1bf8b55a728428deff8bceb945479c4aa7e4559b15e330877e0cde610a8e4198

previous_row_hash: ec433908650fba942c89ff7aa49b014b3be1c3e2d92f74c387e10ffec884a07a

source_artifact_hashes: 8a5472fdd1920a545a6cd23903a360f37d7d5b510b90a745cc428831c4399030, b0531780eace272220317cc65980466fa51de7e4cf7a24fc12466ffff5e3f860

Who shaped the price

Participant and integrity screen

Participant-flow screens flagged concentration, unknown-flow, or low-edge-flow conditions for review. This is an integrity-risk screen, not a manipulation accusation and not person-level identity resolution.

Scored flow

0%

0 scored accounts

Unknown flow

100%

higher unknown flow lowers confidence

Participants

9

public accounts observed

Top flow share

99.8%

concentration diagnostic

high participant concentrationhigh unknown flow shareunknown or low sample flow present

Not claiming: wash-trading detection; sybil detection; manipulation-free market.

Ingest status

Source freshness window

The current ingest window is clean enough for review. This is freshness reporting, not an uptime SLA.

Latest orderbook

2026-05-22T22:16:10.989Z

most recent orderbook evidence attached to this card

Sources

1

1 healthy | 0 degraded | 0 stale | 0 failing

Dropped events

0

nonzero dropped events block current-language claims

Observed age

55s

oldest observed source watermark

Ingested age

52s

oldest ingest watermark

Canary vs v1

Validation state

Canary pipeline

blocked

Current card has source, evidence, or robustness issues to clear.

Public v1 promotion

4 public v1 validation gates still open.

Canary readiness says the current batch can be reviewed. Public v1 promotion waits for coverage, clean source-health windows, resolved outcomes, and formula-freeze evidence.

Read the promotion evidence contract
  • Not enough pillars on this card are measured yet.
  • Some pillars on this card are still gathering evidence.
  • 14 consecutive clean source-health days have not yet been observed.
  • 30 current cards across 3 market categories are not yet reached.
  • The scoring formula must be frozen before validation runs.
  • At least one resolved-outcome row is still needed in the validation ledger.

What travels with the score

Top caveats

  • Hard cap: Too much participant flow is unknown while participant-quality evidence is still pending.
  • Current card issue: Not enough pillars on this card are measured yet.
  • Current card issue: Some pillars on this card are still gathering evidence.
  • absence_of_signal_not_proof_of_coherence
  • artifact_hashes_present
  • below_publishable_sample_floor

Validation requirements

Before stable v1

  • 14 consecutive clean source-health days have not yet been observed.
  • 30 current cards across 3 market categories are not yet reached.
  • The scoring formula must be frozen before validation runs.
  • At least one resolved-outcome row is still needed in the validation ledger.

Non-scoring provenance

External context

No external baseline family is mapped for this market yet.

No external baseline family is mapped for this market yet.

External context is non-scoring in v0.2. Market Trust still measures market-quality substrate, not absolute truth against outside forecasts.

Rating substrate

Seven-pillar evidence grid

Coherence

weight 20 · heuristic

50 / 100

No full-provenance CME signal is linked to this condition in the current ledger window; absence of a signal is not proof of coherence.

no linked cme signal in windowabsence of signal not proof of coherencecme signal window days:7

Liquidity

weight 15 · heuristic

65 / 100

One-sided visible ladder; direct spread unavailable, so liquidity is capped and caveated.

one sided orderbook boundarydirect bid ask spread missingvisible $1k ladder slippage 0pp

Depth

weight 15 · measured

100 / 100

$1k visible-ladder slippage estimate is 0pp.

visible ladder slippage measured

Resolution reliability

weight 15 · heuristic

70 / 100

Resolution source and rule text are present but not independently reviewed.

resolution metadata present manual review pending

Participant quality

weight 20 · pending

pending

Participant-quality inputs exist but do not meet coverage floors.

below publishable sample floorhigh participant concentrationhigh unknown flow share

Integrity risk screen

weight 10 · pending

75 / 100

Mild concentration or coordination signals; review before citing.

top-3 wallets control 100% of notional flowflow events:9distinct wallets:9

Audit completeness

weight 5 · measured

100 / 100

5 linked artifacts; 0 missing hashes; 0 stale/failing sources.

artifact hashes presentsource watermarks healthy

Linked-market consistency

Coherence block

No full-provenance CME signal is linked to this condition in the current ledger window; absence of a signal is not proof of coherence.

Score

50

heuristic evidence

Source refs

0

linked-market or CME artifacts

no linked cme signal in window absence of signal not proof of coherence cme signal window days:7 recent full provenance signals:250

Sensitivity and drivers

Robustness block

Sensitivity verdict

stable

leave-one-out and weight perturbation

Leave-one-out

66-80

score range

Weight perturbation

71-73

score range

Drivers

3

largest weighted contributors

  • Coherence is heuristic, not fully measured.
  • Coherence scores below 60 and needs stronger evidence before the verdict can improve.
  • Liquidity is heuristic, not fully measured.
  • Resolution reliability is heuristic, not fully measured.
  • Participant quality is pending, not fully measured.
  • Integrity screen is pending, not fully measured.

Boundary of the packet

This packet is market diligence, not investment advice, not a claim of absolute truth, and not proof that any trader should buy or sell. It answers whether the market price has enough substrate to cite, monitor, discount, or ignore with receipts attached.